Slashing, tokenomics and risks
Objective slashing conditions, published supply facts and $ZKOS risks.
Slashing rules#
Only objective conditions that can be checked on-chain can lead to slashing.
| Bond | Condition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Launch bond | Liquidity removed inside the protected window | Creator pulls pool liquidity before the window in the manifest ends |
| Launch bond | Creator allocation moved before its milestone unlock | Tokens leave the creator address before the declared holder count is reached |
| Vouch stake | Same conditions as the launch bond it vouched for | |
| Keeper or prover bond | Settlement late or proof invalid | A batch is not settled within its deadline |
| Daemon bond | A proven action breaks the declared policy | An agent trades a market its policy excludes |
Appeals process: TBD
Tokenomics#
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Total supply | 1,000,000,000 $ZKOS |
| Chain | Robinhood Chain (4663) |
| Contract | 0x0f6063348c825632fe25e8d587ab7247ccca3e32 |
| Allocation | TBD |
| Vesting | TBD |
| Emissions | TBD |
Allocation, vesting and emissions details have not been published here.
Risks#
- Smart contract risk: contracts can have bugs, even after audits.
- Governance risk: holders could vote for poor parameters within the allowed bounds.
- Regulatory uncertainty: rules for tokens differ by country and can change.
- Liquidity risk: there may be little or no market to buy or sell.
- The token may have no market value.
Last updated 2026-09-28